Published on:

By

No, it does not affect your ability to file for bankruptcy protection in either Missouri or Illinois. But in terms of full disclosure, the cases would need to be identified clearly on your bankruptcy schedules so that the Trustee is made aware of it. Once this disclosure is made, it is up to the Trustee to determine if there is anything for your creditors.

When you file a Missouri or Illinois bankruptcy, it is required that you disclose all of your assets and personal property to the court. In other words, you cannot withhold information concerning your ownership interest in anything. This is true regardless of whether you believe the asset or property has any value or not. Included in this list would be any claims or cases you have pending at the state court level, like a workman’s compensation claim or personal injury case.

Of course, cases of this nature tend to take a long time before they are finally decided upon. It is not unusual for a personal injury case, for instance, to take several years before a ruling is made in the state court. And it is also true that just because a case of this nature has been filed in the state court (whether it is a workman’s compensation or personal injury), that does not necessarily mean that you will actually receive any money in damages. These types of cases are highly contingent upon a number of factors that must be proven sufficiently to either a state court judge or jury. On the other hand, it may very well be that your case will settle before going to trial, in which case, you would stand to receive some sort of bulk payment from the party that you sued (after your attorney takes his thirty percent for fees). And if this is the outcome, then it’s important to understand how your bankruptcy Trustee will handle it.

By
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

By

Yes and no. This happens to be one of those situations in which a ‘yes and no’ answer is appropriate. There are very specific rules concerning joint debt between a married couple. So if you are planning on filing a Missouri or Illinois bankruptcy, this is a great blog post to read.

To begin with, when you file for bankruptcy, the court requires that you disclose all of your creditors. This means that you must give the name, address, and account number for each entity or person you owe (including an indication of things like amount owed, what kind of debt it is, and whether or not the debt has been passed onto a collection agency). All the creditors are then notified of the fact that you have filed a bankruptcy petition, and they in turn may never try to collect on the debt ever again. At the end of your bankruptcy, all the unsecured creditors (like credit cards, medical bills, payday loans, etc.) are discharged.

So let’s assume that you are married, and you have a few credit cards that you own jointly with your spouse. If you own such a debt jointly with someone (whether it is a spouse or someone else), then both parties are liable for the balance. This means that the creditor can demand payment from either person, and it can sue either party if payments are not made. A ‘joint’ debt means just that: you both own it. If you then decide to file bankruptcy individually (without your spouse), these debts are disclosed (again, because the court requires it). But in this case, only you would be discharged as to the joint debts in question. In other words, the creditors could no longer come after you for the joint debts, but they could still continue to come after your spouse.

By
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

By

This is one of the more common things I hear from clients. And it makes sense: if you are dealing with large sums of debt, collection agencies are calling you night and day, and you can’t seem to figure out how to manage your finances, things can get pretty stressful. But one of the more pleasant components of my job is when I see someone for the first time (at an initial consultation), and by the time they have left, they are feeling much better about the future. Let me explain why.

It has not been at all unusual to see people having a difficult time getting by in this economy. Times are hard, to say the least. As a result, many individuals have either lost their job, had their wages cut, or been laid off and are now earning far less than what they were used to. When this kind of thing happens, it has a tremendous ripple effect. Because it’s not as if your creditors will stop asking for money when the monthly bills come due. At this point, a lot of people will go further into debt by taking out yet another credit card to pay on the one that they are about to fall behind on (literally robbing Peter to pay Paul). Or, they will allow the debts to go into default, and a collection agency will pick it up.

This is a road that often leads to heartache and stress of an enormous magnitude. Things can seem completely out-of-control, your life spinning beyond your grasp. But there are better times ahead.

By
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

By

Then they are lying to you. Because they don’t have a warrant, nor do they even have permission to sue in the first place. But then these are exactly the types of things that are blatant violations of the law.

The area of law that dictates what a debt collector can and can’t do is the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). This statute spells out all the things that a collector cannot do when they attempt to collect. One of the things that they certainly cannot do is threaten you with a lawsuit (let alone a warrant for your arrest). The reason why such tactics are used is because they typically scare people into paying money (money that they really do not have). Imagine if you are sitting at home and the collection agent calls, saying that unless you pay a certain amount of money right now, you are going to get thrown in jail. Pretty scary stuff! But it’s a lie. There isn’t a judge in the entire country who is going to issue a warrant for a credit card you defaulted on. That’s not what they do.

The original creditor can sue you for breach of contract, but unless the collection agency has specific, express permission from the original creditor to sue, it cannot even mention such a thing. It cannot threaten to sue, or even threaten to have the debt sent to the credit bureau. All of these things are violations of the FDCPA.

By
Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

By

Immediately. Most people believe that it will take many, many years before they can ever again enjoy anything like a decent credit score after filing for a Missouri bankruptcy. But the exact opposite is true. In most cases, an individual can begin to see upward movement of their credit rating within weeks after filing, and revive the score to proper levels within one to two years.

When you file a St. Louis Chapter 7 bankruptcy, all of your unsecured debts (things like credit cards, medical bills, payday loans, etc.) are discharged. That means the debts are wiped out forever, and the creditors can never again demand payment from you. At this point, you can expect to see an immediate jump in your credit score by about a twenty (20) to thirty (30) points. Your opportunities to rebuild even further are going to be there immediately as well. For instance, upon receiving your discharge of debts, you will be flooded with credit card applications. That’s right, flooded. The credit industry (the very entity that had been trying to convince you that filing for bankruptcy was the worst mistake you’ll ever make in your life) will be begging you to come back! This may seem counterintuitive, but the reason for why is simple: overnight you will have become the most attractive candidate in the world. All of your old debt will have been knocked out, which means that you will presumably be in a good position to make monthly minimum payments to them. Of course, there goal would be to get you right back into the same position as before (in which you are racked with burdensome debt levels). But so long as you make small purchases, make monthly methodical payments, you will see your score rise nicely. Most of our Chapter 7 clients are making big purchases on cars and houses within a couple of years after filing.

In a St. Louis Chapter 13 bankruptcy, you are put inside a repayment plan. This will last over a period of three (3) to five (5) years in length. During this time, you will make a single, monthly, consolidated payment to a Trustee to cover certain debts (like arrearage on a house, car note, and tax debt). The Trustee will distribute the monies according to the plan each month. This in turn means that by the time you are done with the repayment plan three to five years later, your credit score is going to look rock solid. And of course, your ability to move even higher is bound only by how aggressive you wish to be in raising it.

By
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

By

No, they cannot. This would be a clear violation of federal law.

The area of law governing this particular subject is the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). This federal statute regulates what a collection agency can and cannot do when they attempt to collect on a debt. Section 804(5) states specifically that: ‘Any debt collector communicating with any person other than the consumer for the purpose of acquiring location information about the consumer shall – not use any language or symbol on any envelope or in the contents of any communications effected by the mails or telegram that indicates that the debt collector is in the debt collection business or that the communication relates to the collection of a debt.’

This is pretty straightforward language, as far as legal statutes go. It is clear on its face as to its meaning, with no ambiguity as to the intent of what it is trying to say. This is what lawyer like myself love to read. It means that conduct on the part of the collection agency that is unlawful is as easy to prove as simply saying, “Your Honor, do you see this envelope that has the words ‘Joe Smith owes a debt and we are trying to collect on it’? That is a clear violation of the law.” Of course, it’s not ever that clear. The collection agencies are usually smarter than that. But that doesn’t mean that violations of this type do not occur with frequency.

By
Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

By

This is nothing to panic about. You can always add a creditor later. Of course, getting everyone thrown in the first time is the easier way of going about things. But the court recognizes that you may end up forgetting a debt that will need to be included at a later time.

The fundamental idea behind the filing of a bankruptcy is disclosure: you are expected to let the court and Trustee know everything about your particular situation. That would include (but is not limited to) a disclosure of all items that you own, whether it is in the form of personal property (like furniture, appliances, clothes, or even bank accounts) or real property (like a house, rental property, or even a time share in Florida). These disclosures let the court and Trustee know what types of things you own that may have equity or substantial value (and therefore subject to liquidation). The court will also want to know what sort of household income you have, whether those sources of income come from your place of employment, Social Security, unemployment benefits, or even from a small business that you run part time out of your basement (because this information will largely determine which chapter of bankruptcy you qualify for). And the court will also expect you to disclose all of your creditors, whether those creditors are in the form of a credit card at your favorite department store, a medical bill from your family doctor, or even debts owed to friends and family. These creditors (whether they are secured or unsecured) have an absolute right to be notified of your bankruptcy filing so that they may do a number of things (like file a Proof of Claim detailing the specifics of your debt, ask for notification of any hearings that may take place in regards to the outcome of your discharge, and the ability to challenge the dischargeability of the debt).

Unless the creditors receive this type of notification, they are thought to have no idea of the fact that your debt to them is subject to discharge by the bankruptcy court. So even if you initially forget to include any one creditor in your bankruptcy petition, you can still add them later (and in fact, you have a duty to do so). There is of course a small fee to include the new creditors (currently set a $30), but that is a small price to pay when the debt you forgot to include is $5,000.

By
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

By

The answer to this question, unfortunately, hinges a great deal on your own personal feelings about the subject of bankruptcy. I have heard many people tell me (with absolute conviction) that people who file for bankruptcy are the very individuals who are bringing the country down, because they are irresponsible and do not want to take control of their lives. I believe this sentiment is ill-founded, and I’d like to explain why.

The credit industry in this country is incredibly powerful. Its lobbyists are considered to be the finest in the nation, and they get pretty much what they want. As the economy has taken a dive, and as more and more jobs that people once thought they could count on disappear, individuals and families have continued to look towards their lines of credit as a last resort to stay afloat. This means using things like credit cards on food, gas, rent, utilities, and other basics that people need in order to live. And as people have come to rely more and more on this last-resort devices, the credit industry has made it easier and easier for people to take out ever-larger lines of credit (there are very few of us who have not received four or five pieces of mail per week that are nothing more than applications from some company telling you how easy it is to get free money).

Of course, the credit industry has gone to great lengths to claim that it is the individual’s personal responsibility that must dictate their spending habits. And this claim is fair enough on its face. But this does not really explain why there are thirty to forty booths on every college campus the first day of classes filled with credit card vendors throwing free t-shirts to every kid that walks by, while screaming, ‘Hey, come fill out this application , and you’ll have your very own credit card by the end the of the week’; or why the credit industry ruthlessly targets senior citizens with ad campaigns for large lines of credit, when they know full well that these individuals are on fixed incomes and have no real ability to pay back the sums of money that they desperately need. The industry goes after these people not because they see an opportunity to help out a group of citizens that need a helping hand in their time of need; rather, they see people who are either gullible or completely cash-strapped to meet their needs. For it is these people who will typically overspend on their credit card purchases, who will accidentally forget to pay their monthly minimum on time (which allows the industry to pump up the interest rates through the ceiling), and who will most likely take out another card in order to pay for the first card (the old ‘robbing-Peter-to-pay-Paul’ scenario, because they simply have no other income). These people are not considered risky investments to give lines of credit to (which of course they should be). Instead, they are thought of as cash-cows, over whom the credit industry salivates and can’t wait to get their hands on.

By
Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

By

Yes, it does. In fact, that is the threshold question in determining which chapter of bankruptcy you might qualify for. The rules are very precise on this question, but as always, finding the right attorney who understands this specialized area of law is invaluable.

To begin with, it should be known right away that when you file a Missouri bankruptcy, the government is going to want to know two main things about your situation: 1) your household size (i.e. how many people besides yourself live with you; and 2) what is your household income (i.e. the amount of money from all sources of income). The answer to these two questions will do more to determine your bankruptcy options than anything else.

The government will specifically want to know what the household income was the six months prior to filing for bankruptcy. This period is described as the ‘CMI period’ (or Current Monthly Income). To determine this amount of money, people will typically look to their last six month’s worth of paystubs. Using the gross income figures (the amount you were paid before taxes and other deductions were taken out), the last six months are tabulated. So for instance if you are married, and you and your spouse both work, then both of your CMI periods will have to be calculated (which means coming up with the last six months of pay advices). This amount is then annualized to determine what your household income is.

By
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

By

Yes, you can. So long as you file a Missouri Chapter 13. In a St. Louis Chapter 7 bankruptcy, you are not able to get rid of a second (or junior) mortgage. But even if you qualify for a Missouri Chapter 7, it is still a good idea to look into a 13 for this very reason.

In a St. Louis Chapter 13 bankruptcy, one of the major benefits is the option of stripping off a second mortgage against your home. In many instances, this can eliminate up to tens of thousands of dollars off what you owe on the house. But there are of course a few rules that apply that must be satisfied in order to qualify.

So let’s say for instance that you own a home in which you owe a principal balances of $100,000 on a first mortgage. And you owe a balance of an additional $30,000 on a second mortgage. Let us also assume that the fair market value of your home is $90,000. In this scenario, the value of your home is actually less than the amount you owe on your first mortgage. But if the value of your home (in other words, the amount of money that you realistically think you could sell your house for in the current economic conditions) were more than one hundred thousand, then you would have a situation in which the value was more than the amount owed on the first mortgage.

By
Published on:
Updated:
Contact Information