Published on:

By

Because not disclosing to the Bankruptcy Court a list of everything that you have an ownership interest in can possibly result in the court ruling that you have committed bankruptcy fraud. So it’s really not worth withholding information, especially when the item in question is just a simple piece of personal property.

When you file a St. Louis bankruptcy, it is necessary for you to do a number of things. These responsibilities will include providing evidence of household income over the six (6) months prior to filing (this is usually the last six month’s worth of paystubs), your most recent tax returns (which is usually your federal and state returns from the year before), and an accounting of all of your assets (whether it is in the form of personal or real property).

Real property is easy enough to disclose. You just provide a list of all the real estate in which you claim an ownership interest in. This could be your home, rental property, farmland, a camping site, or timeshare. The main thing that the Bankruptcy Trustee will be interested in will be whether or not there is any equity in the property. If there is substantial equity in any real property that you own, it is possible that the Trustee will either want to liquidate it in a St. Louis Chapter 7, or make you guarantee the amount of equity to your unsecured creditors in a St. Louis Chapter 13. Whatever the case may be, it is not as if disclosing to the court what real estate you own means that you will lose these assets. In today’s real estate market, with declining values and the number of foreclosures increasing yearly, the fair market value of most homes is less than what is currently owed on the mortgage loan (in other words, most houses are “upside down,” and therefore have no equity at all).

Published on:

By

Yes, but only after they go through the normal procedural hoops the court requires. This is assuming they have permission from the original creditor to do so in the first place. But let me back up and explain a few things first.

When a debt is passed on to a collection agency, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) begins to take effect. This federal law regulates what a debt collector can and cannot do in their attempts to collect on a debt. And if the collector violates this law, it should be held accountable.

So for instance, the law states that a collector cannot threaten you with a wage garnishment if it has no right to do so. A lot of collection agencies will of course make this threat, knowing full well that they are not in a lawful position to do so. Besides, even if they have permission from the original creditor, they would still have to go through the regular procedures in order to get the garnishment in place.

By
Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

By

The most a creditor can garnish from your wages is 25% of your net earnings (after all deductions like taxes and health insurance are taken out) from each paycheck. Or if you are classified as head-of-household status on your taxes, then you can get that amount down to 10% of net earnings. But there is a bit more to it than just this.

The only way that a creditor can garnish your wages is if they first get a judgment against you. The only way a judgment can be handed down against you is there was a hearing on the matter in a court of law. And the only way there could have been a hearing is if you were first served with a summons. So the order of events (after the creditor files suit against you for breach of contract) is as follows: 1) you are served with a summons (which usually consists of a copy of the complaint against you, a copy of the original contract between you and the creditor, and the summons page itself which lists the court date, time, and place); 2) a hearing is held at which you have the opportunity to appear and make an argument in your defense; 3) assuming that the creditor receives a judgment in its favor, they can then move towards a wage garnishment (or a bank levy). Unless these steps are taken first, the creditor cannot garnish your wages.

But let’s assume that you are currently being garnished in the state of Missouri. In that case, they can only take up to 25% of the net (or 10% if head-of-household). Once this becomes the state of affairs, your options are limited to two main things: you can either pay the debt in full, or file for bankruptcy.

By
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

By

It depends on which chapter of a St. Louis bankruptcy that you file. The two main chapter are a 7 and 13, both of which I will discuss in some detail below.

The most common form of bankruptcy is the St. Louis Chapter 7. This is usually described as a “straight discharge” of debt in which you unsecured obligations (such as credit cards, medical bills, payday loans, etc) are knocked out completely. Such a bankruptcy usually lasts (from start to finish) about three to four months. This timeframe covers the actual filing of the case, your 341 hearing, and your official discharge. From the Debtor’s point of view (when you file for bankruptcy, you are referred to as the “Debtor”), this process is pretty straight forward and simple. Your lawyer does all the legwork, and you just have to show up for one hearing at court (during which you answer a few “yes-no” questions).

The other main type of bankruptcy is a St. Louis Chapter 13. This form of bankruptcy is described as a repayment plan over the course of three to five years, during which you pay back certain debts (for instance, mortgage arrearage, car loans, tax debt, back child support, and possibly some of your unsecured debts as well). A monthly payment is set, and you make those payments to the Trustee (who then disperses the funds to the various creditors listed on your Missouri Chapter 13 plan). The shortest length of time you can be in a 13 is three (3) years, and the longest amount of time is five (5) years.

By
Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

By

Yes, there are several. Many of these restrictions are codified into federal law, specifically the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). And when a debt collector violates this act, it must be held accountable for having trampled upon your consumer rights.

The FDCPA is a federal law which lays out in plain language what a collector can and cannot do when it attempts to collect on a debt. For instance, a St. Louis collection agency may not make continuous calls to your place of work without your permission, it may not make repeated calls to your family, friends, or neighbors without your permission, and it may not make excessive calls per day to your home or cellular phone.

Another duty placed upon all collectors is that they must provide verification of the debt in question, upon your request, and especially within thirty (30) days of having first sent you notice (usually by way of a letter) of the debt. So for example, if you receive a letter from Collection Agency X saying that you owe an unpaid hospital bill for $25, the letter should also state that you have the right to ask for verification of this debt within 30 days of receipt (if it does not contain this language, then they are in clear violation of the FDCPA). This means that you have the opportunity to demand that the collector provide you with proof of the debt in question (this usually is in the form of a breakdown of the debt, like an itemized bill). If the debt collector does not provide you with such proof, then they are in violation of federal law.

By
Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

By

No, not at all. In fact, if your attorney knows what he/she is doing, then it is quite possible that all of your belongings will remain with you (and therefore out of the Trustee’s hands).

When you file a St. Louis bankruptcy, it is necessary for you to disclose to the court in writing all that you have an ownership interest in. But let’s be clear: “disclosing” your assets and personal property is not the same thing as handing them over to someone. When you make a disclosure, you are simply saying “this is what I own.” And according to the Bankruptcy Code, it is your duty to make the court aware of all that you own.

Once this task is accomplished, your attorney will then attach the applicable state exemptions to your property in order to make it safe. Exemptions are like little shields of armor that are placed around your property to keep out of the hands of the Bankruptcy Trustee. Each state has certain exemptions to cover certain assets (if you have lived in the state of Missouri for at least the last two years, then MO exemptions are utilized). For example, the state allows for a $3,000 exemption for your personal property, such as furniture, dishes, appliances, etc. This may not sound like a large exemption to cover such things, but keep in mind that you will be giving “garage sale value” for these items. Garage sale value is considerably lower than what you paid for the item in the first place (or even what you think you should get for it, and certainly lower than any sentimental value attached to the item in question). Most people have household goods that are at or below this threshold, so exempting all of their things is no problem.

Published on:

Yes, it will.

I could just end the conversation there, but you are probably wanting a fuller explanation as to why!! Most people operate under the misperception that filing a St. Louis bankruptcy will ruin their credit rating forever. They believe that they will never be able to purchase a home, a car, or even finance a pair of socks at JCPenney. But as I mentioned, this is a misperception.

One of the biggest misperception people have about filing a Missouri bankruptcy is that doing so will completely limit their ability to reestablish a line of credit for seven to ten years. This is completely untrue. This perception is based on numbers that are frequently thrown around at will (normally by people who have no idea what they are talking about). The filing of a bankruptcy (or it might be better to say that the fact that you have filed a bankruptcy) will remain on your credit report for ten (10) years. The automatic assumption is that this fact will prevent them from gaining any ground within that ten year timeframe. But this is simply not the case.

Published on:

By

It depends on a number of factors, but the main consideration to keep in mind is that if the transfer was significant or large, then it is possible that the Bankruptcy Trustee would want to investigate the matter.

But let me back up just a little bit. When you file a St. Louis bankruptcy, the court requires that you disclose a great deal of information about yourself. Included on this list would be everything that you own (cars, houses, clothes, furniture, and jewelry; but also things like bank accounts, stocks and bonds, mutual funds, and retirement plans; and then there may also be lawsuits that you are a part of from which you may receive funds). The reason why such a disclosure must occur is because the Trustee is entitled to know exactly what you own (or have an ownership interest in). This is because the Trustee’s main job is to determine if there are any assets you own that have a good deal of equity or value. If in fact there are any assets that have a good deal of equity or value, it is possible the Trustee would want to liquidate the asset, and use the proceeds to pay towards the unsecured creditors that will be discharged in your Missouri bankruptcy.

But the Trustee is also entitled to know if you have made any transfers of goods, assets, or money to an “insider”. An insider is described as a friend or family member (so obviously not a typical unsecured creditor like a credit card, medical bill, or payday loan). Whenever a transfer is made to an insider, the main thing that the Trustee will want to know is: how much was transferred. The Trustee has an opportunity to look into any insider transfers within the full year preceding the filing of your St. Louis Chapter 7 bankruptcy.

Published on:

By

In a surprisingly shorter period of time than you may think. The filing of a Missouri bankruptcy allows for what is called a “fresh start / clean slate“. This means that once a discharge of your unsecured debts (like credit cards, medical bills, payday loans, etc.) occurs, you are in a perfect position to move forward with life. This would include opportunities to purchase big ticket items, such as a new car.

More often than not, when you are dealing with aggressive creditors and collection agencies, your stress level is pretty high. This is especially the case when you have lost your job, or if your hours have been severely cut. Financial stress can cause families to fight, relationships to fray, and your self-esteem to wither. But there is a definite light at the end of this tunnel.

The discharge of debts through a St. Louis bankruptcy can open the door to a whole new world. If for instance you are in need of a new car (because your current one does not run very well, or the one you have has an incredibly high interest rate attached to it, or even because the one you own right now just barely makes it down the street), you might first go to look into buying a new one. But when you attempt to purchase it, the dealer is very hesitant to negotiate a deal with you because of your credit rating.

By
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

By

If your creditors sue you, they will surely be awarded a judgment in their favor. Once they have a judgment in hand, they can move towards things like a wage garnishment, bank levy, or even the placement of a lien against your home.

When you fall behind on your debts, the creditor will undoubtedly begin demanding that you come current. This will include a number of phone calls each day, nasty letters, and perhaps even a call made to you place of work. If these efforts to collect do not bear fruit, then the creditor will move towards a lawsuit against you for breach of contract.

Procedurally, whenever a lawsuit is filed (breach of contract included), the filing party must make sure that the non-filing party is served with a summons. This is done by hiring a process server who usually comes to your home or job to hand deliver the documents. Receipt of the summons is considered to be your notice of the hearing for the breach of contract. Obviously, you have an opportunity to show up and make an argument in front of the judge. But there is a very good likelihood that you will not win (unless you can show that you do not owe the debt alleged, or that you have already paid the debt in full).

By
Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:
Contact Information